Comparison Overview

Birmingham Rail

VS

Amsted Rail

Birmingham Rail

P O Box 530157, Birmingham, Alabama, 35253, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Birmingham Rail has been a trusted partner to the railroad and industrial markets for over a century. With more than 125 years of experience, we provide a comprehensive range of products and services, specializing in new and relay rail, track materials, crane rail, and accessories. From our 40-acre manufacturing facility in Lipscomb, Alabama, and our distribution center in Houston, Texas, we serve customers nationwide. Our Bessemer, Alabama location is dedicated to manufacturing high-quality switch material for distributors, contractors, and industrial clients.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Amsted Rail

311 S. Wacker Blvd, Chicago, IL, 60606, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Amsted Rail is a globally integrated manufacturer. Railroads, as well as car builders, owners and leasing companies rely on us to provide components and innovative systems for freight cars and locomotives, repair and service, track maintenance, and location and condition monitoring. From the big picture to the finest detail, Amsted Rail is continuously improving the heavy haul landscape. Industry leaders for more than 100 years, our experience, dedication and efficiency make it possible for railroads to haul heavier loads, over greater distances, with improved reliability and performance. Heavy haulers, the world over, depend on Amsted Rail to perform in the toughest service environments. Amsted Rail is proud to be a part of Amsted Industries Corporation. A diversified manufacturer of highly engineered industrial components, Amsted Industries is a leader in the railroad, vehicular and construction markets. Privately held with manufacturing facilities in over 10 countries, Amsted Industries employs more than 17,000 people. Amsted Rail Highlights: -Largest Freight Car Component Manufacturer in the World -Industry Leaders in wheels, bearings, side frames & bolsters -Privately Held & Employee Owned -Operations on Six Continents

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 1,123
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/birmingham-rail-&-locomotive-co-.jpeg
Birmingham Rail
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amsted-rail-inc.jpeg
Amsted Rail
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Birmingham Rail
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Amsted Rail
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Birmingham Rail in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amsted Rail in 2025.

Incident History — Birmingham Rail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Birmingham Rail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Amsted Rail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amsted Rail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/birmingham-rail-&-locomotive-co-.jpeg
Birmingham Rail
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amsted-rail-inc.jpeg
Amsted Rail
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Amsted Rail company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Birmingham Rail company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Amsted Rail company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Birmingham Rail company.

In the current year, Amsted Rail company and Birmingham Rail company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Amsted Rail company nor Birmingham Rail company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Amsted Rail company nor Birmingham Rail company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Amsted Rail company nor Birmingham Rail company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Birmingham Rail company nor Amsted Rail company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Birmingham Rail nor Amsted Rail holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Amsted Rail company and Birmingham Rail company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Amsted Rail company employs more people globally than Birmingham Rail company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Birmingham Rail nor Amsted Rail holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Birmingham Rail nor Amsted Rail holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Birmingham Rail nor Amsted Rail holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Birmingham Rail nor Amsted Rail holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Birmingham Rail nor Amsted Rail holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Birmingham Rail nor Amsted Rail holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H