Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Philips BioTel HeartPhilips BioTel Heart
VS
Agilent TechnologiesAgilent Technologies
Philips BioTel Heart

Philips BioTel Heart

1000 Cedar Hollow Rd., Malvern, PA, US, 19355

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
723/1000Moderate

CardioNet was just the beginning. Founded on an innovative, patented technology, the result of years of research and development, the company received FDA approval for its core monitoring technology and was the first to provide real-time, heartbeat-by-heartbeat, ECG mon...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:456
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Agilent Technologies

Agilent Technologies

5301 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Santa Clara, 95051, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.agilent.com
802/1000Good

Agilent customers are finding new ways to treat cancer, ensure food, water, air, and medicine quality and safety, discover new drug treatments, research infectious diseases, and create alternative energy solutions for a greener planet. From start to finish, we have them...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:17,508
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Philips BioTel Heart

Philips BioTel Heart

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Agilent Technologies

Agilent Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Philips BioTel Heart in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Agilent Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Philips BioTel Heart (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Philips BioTel Heart cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Agilent Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Agilent Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Philips BioTel Heart

Philips BioTel Heart

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BIO423072725
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
PHI211618123
Agilent Technologies

Agilent Technologies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Philips BioTel Heart company and Agilent Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Philips BioTel Heart company and Agilent Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Philips BioTel Heart company and Agilent Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Philips BioTel Heart company and Agilent Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Philips BioTel Heart company and Agilent Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Philips BioTel Heart company and Agilent Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Philips BioTel Heart company and Agilent Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Philips BioTel Heart company and Agilent Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Philips BioTel Heart company and Agilent Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Philips BioTel Heart company and Agilent Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Philips BioTel Heart company and Agilent Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Philips BioTel Heart and Agilent Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Philips BioTel Heart and Agilent Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Philips BioTel Heart or Agilent Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Philips BioTel Heart or Agilent Technologies ?
Between Philips BioTel Heart and Agilent Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Philips BioTel Heart and Agilent Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA