Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit MedicalBiolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical
VS
STERISSTERIS
Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical

Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical

8163 25th Ct E, Sarasota, Florida, US, 34243

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.biolife.com
423/1000Critical

Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical, is medical device company in Sarasota, Florida, that manufactures innovative healthcare and first aid solutions that improve patient care and outcomes. All Biolife products are comprised of a powder with two main ingr...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:136
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
STERIS

STERIS

5960 Heisley Rd, Mentor, 44060, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.steris.com
781/1000Fair

STERIS is a leading provider of infection prevention and other procedural products and services, focused primarily on healthcare, pharmaceutical and medical device Customers. MISSION WE HELP OUR CUSTOMERS CREATE A HEALTHIER AND SAFER WORLD by providing innovative healt...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:10,716
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical

Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
STERIS

STERIS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for STERIS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - STERIS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STERIS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical

Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
BIO4503245111125
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
BIO0602606110425
STERIS

STERIS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical company and STERIS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical company and STERIS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical company and STERIS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical company and STERIS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical company and STERIS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical company and STERIS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical company and STERIS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical company and STERIS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical company and STERIS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical company and STERIS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical company and STERIS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical and STERIS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical and STERIS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical or STERIS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical or STERIS ?
Between Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical and STERIS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Biolife, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merit Medical and STERIS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA