Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BinniesBinnies
VS
AECOMAECOM
Binnies

Binnies

Binnies, Redhill, Surrey, RH1 1SH, GB

Last Update: 07/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.binnies.com
759/1000Fair

Together with our strategic partners, we can address everything from supporting vulnerable customers, water quality, asset performance and leak detection, to integrated planning and energy recovery We develop intelligent solutions using our award-winning integrated pla...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:861
Subsidiaries:124
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AECOM

AECOM

13355 Noel Road, Dallas, 75240, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aecom.com
782/1000Fair

AECOM is the global infrastructure leader, committed to delivering a better world. As a trusted professional services firm powered by deep technical abilities, we solve our clients’ complex challenges in water, environment, energy, transportation and buildings. Our team...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:61,504
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Binnies

Binnies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AECOM

AECOM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Binnies in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AECOM in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Binnies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Binnies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AECOM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AECOM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Binnies

Binnies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AECOM

AECOM

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AEC745072725

FAQ

Between Binnies company and AECOM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Binnies company and AECOM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Binnies company and AECOM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Binnies company and AECOM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Binnies company and AECOM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Binnies company and AECOM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Binnies company and AECOM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Binnies company and AECOM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Binnies company and AECOM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Binnies company and AECOM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Binnies company and AECOM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Binnies and AECOM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Binnies and AECOM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Binnies or AECOM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Binnies or AECOM ?
Between Binnies and AECOM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Binnies and AECOM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8