Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Binnies DCWWBinnies DCWW
VS
FerrovialFerrovial
Binnies DCWW

Binnies DCWW

Cardiff, GB

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:124
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ferrovial

Ferrovial

Amsterdam, NL

Last Update: 04/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.ferrovial.com
809/1000Good

Ferrovial is a leading global infrastructure company transforming highways, airports, and energy around the world. Its distinctive integrated business model supports the entire lifecycle of complex projects, from design and financing to construction, operation and maint...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:12,658
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Binnies DCWW

Binnies DCWW

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ferrovial

Ferrovial

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Binnies DCWW in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ferrovial in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Binnies DCWW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Binnies DCWW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ferrovial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ferrovial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Binnies DCWW

Binnies DCWW

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ferrovial

Ferrovial

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Binnies DCWW company and Ferrovial company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Binnies DCWW company and Ferrovial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Binnies DCWW company and Ferrovial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Binnies DCWW company and Ferrovial company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Binnies DCWW company and Ferrovial company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Binnies DCWW company and Ferrovial company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Binnies DCWW company and Ferrovial company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Binnies DCWW company and Ferrovial company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Binnies DCWW company and Ferrovial company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Binnies DCWW company and Ferrovial company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Binnies DCWW company and Ferrovial company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Binnies DCWW and Ferrovial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Binnies DCWW and Ferrovial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Binnies DCWW or Ferrovial ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Binnies DCWW or Ferrovial ?
Between Binnies DCWW and Ferrovial, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Binnies DCWW and Ferrovial, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-88964
SUMMARY

An integer underflow in OpenVPN version 2.7_alpha3 through 2.7.7 on Windows and Android allows remote authenticated servers to cause a denial of service or memory disclosure via crafted domain search options

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-13
UPDATED
Date2026-10-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53564
SUMMARY

Vulnerability in Citrix UniconOS leading to Arbitrary file read and write This issue affects UniconOS: before 2607.2 CR and before 2603 LTSR CU2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-13
UPDATED
Date2026-10-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53563
SUMMARY

Vulnerability in Citrix UniconOS leading to Persistent Command Execution This issue affects UniconOS: before 2607.2 CR and before 2603 LTSR CU2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-13
UPDATED
Date2026-10-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-15468
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in HYPR Passwordless on Windows allows Privilege Escalation. This issue affects HYPR Passwordless: before 11.3.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-13
UPDATED
Date2026-10-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-105390
SUMMARY

Improper synchronization in the OpenVPN ovpn-dco-win for Windows versions 0.6.5 through 1.3.5 and 2.4.0 through 2.8.7 allows local attackers to trigger a deadlock via a crafted write to the ovpn-dco device, causing the host to become unresponsive.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-13
UPDATED
Date2026-10-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA