Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BinDawood HoldingBinDawood Holding
VS
H&M GroupH&M Group
BinDawood Holding

BinDawood Holding

Madinah Road, Jeddah, 51190, SA

Last Update: 31/05/2026

View Profile
711/1000Moderate

BinDawood Holding (Listed at Saudi Exchange in 2020 under the ticker of 4161), a retail conglomerate that focuses on information technology and retail solutions, it capitalizes on investment opportunities, driving long-term growth. Driven by a vision for sustained growt...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:1,462
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
H&M Group

H&M Group

Årstaängsvägen 13, Stockholm, Stockholm, SE, 117 75

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://hmgroup.com/
819/1000Good

Founded in 1947, H&M Group is a global design company with ~4,702 stores in 76 markets and 56 online markets. At H&M Group, we believe in making great design available to everyone. It’s essential in everything we do. Our family of brands and business ventures offer cust...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:99,888
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BinDawood Holding

BinDawood Holding

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
H&M Group

H&M Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

BinDawood Holding has 44.13% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for H&M Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BinDawood Holding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BinDawood Holding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - H&M Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

H&M Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BinDawood Holding

BinDawood Holding

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BIN1780208708
H&M Group

H&M Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BinDawood Holding company and H&M Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BinDawood Holding company and H&M Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BinDawood Holding company and H&M Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BinDawood Holding company and H&M Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BinDawood Holding company and H&M Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BinDawood Holding company and H&M Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BinDawood Holding company and H&M Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BinDawood Holding company and H&M Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BinDawood Holding company and H&M Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BinDawood Holding company and H&M Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BinDawood Holding company and H&M Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BinDawood Holding and H&M Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BinDawood Holding and H&M Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BinDawood Holding or H&M Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BinDawood Holding or H&M Group ?
Between BinDawood Holding and H&M Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BinDawood Holding and H&M Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57990
SUMMARY

Files or directories accessible to external parties in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57989
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57978
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-17497
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 grants the Tauri shell plugin shell:allow-execute capability for bash, python, and python3 with arbitrary arguments in the default desktop capabilities. JavaScript running in the application webview can therefore invoke plugin:shell|execute to run attacker-controlled operating system commands with the privileges of the NoteGen process. In combination with script execution in the webview (for example via chat XSS), this enables full remote code execution on the user's machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-17496
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 renders AI chat responses with markdown-it configured with html:true and injects the result into the DOM via dangerouslySetInnerHTML in chat-preview, without HTML sanitization and with CSP set to null. Attacker-controlled content that reaches the model prompt (for example a malicious skill REFERENCE.md that instructs the model to emit HTML) can cause the model response to include executable markup such as an img onerror handler. When the user views the chat response, that markup runs as JavaScript in the privileged Tauri webview, enabling arbitrary script execution in the application context (cross-site scripting).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8