Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.ŞBİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş
VS
The UPS StoreThe UPS Store
BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş

BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş

Abdurrahmangazi Mah.Ebubekir Cad. No:73 Sancaktepe, İstanbul, TR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bim.com.tr
796/1000Fair

Türkiye’de perakende sektörünün lideri olan BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş., temel gıda ve tüketim malzemelerinin uygun fiyat ve yüksek kaliteyle tüketiciye ulaştırılması hedefiyle faaliyetlerine 1995 yılında 21 mağazayla başlamıştır. Yüksek indirim (hard-discount) modelini...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:13,526
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The UPS Store

The UPS Store

San Diego, 92121, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.theupsstore.com
741/1000Moderate

With more than 5,500 locally owned locations across North America, The UPS Store is the nation’s largest retail network of shipping, postal, printing and business service centers. The UPS Store, Inc., franchisor for The UPS Store locations in the U.S., is a wholly owned...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:11,930
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş

BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The UPS Store

The UPS Store

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The UPS Store in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The UPS Store (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The UPS Store cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş

BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The UPS Store

The UPS Store

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE1034072725
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE232072825
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE1043072625

FAQ

Between BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company and The UPS Store company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company and The UPS Store company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company and The UPS Store company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company and The UPS Store company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company and The UPS Store company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company and The UPS Store company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company and The UPS Store company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company and The UPS Store company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company and The UPS Store company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company and The UPS Store company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company and The UPS Store company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş and The UPS Store, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş and The UPS Store, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş or The UPS Store ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş or The UPS Store ?
Between BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş and The UPS Store, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş and The UPS Store, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA