Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL)Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL)
VS
UniCreditUniCredit
Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL)

Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL)

69, route d'esch, Luxembourg, undefined, L-2953, LU

Last Update: 04/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bil.com
761/1000Fair

Founded in 1856, Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) is the oldest multi-business bank in the Grand Duchy. It has played an active role in the main stages of development of the Luxembourg economy. It currently operates in retail, private and corporate banking, as w...

NAICS:522
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1,713
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UniCredit

UniCredit

Piazza Gae Aulenti, 3, Milano, 20154, IT

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.unicreditgroup.eu
794/1000Fair

UniCredit is a pan-European Bank with a unique service offering in Italy, Germany, Austria, and Central and Eastern Europe. Our Vision is to be the Bank for Europe's Future. Our Purpose is to Empower Communities to Progress, delivering the best-in-class products and s...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:55,727
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL)

Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UniCredit

UniCredit

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UniCredit in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UniCredit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UniCredit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL)

Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UniCredit

UniCredit

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
UNI1246291222
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
UNI32523423
🔒 Incident : Breach
UNI182081122

FAQ

Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and UniCredit company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and UniCredit company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and UniCredit company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and UniCredit company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and UniCredit company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and UniCredit company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and UniCredit company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and UniCredit company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and UniCredit company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and UniCredit company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and UniCredit company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) and UniCredit, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) and UniCredit, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) or UniCredit ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) or UniCredit ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) and UniCredit, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) and UniCredit, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8