Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL)Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL)
VS
LCLLCL
Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL)

Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL)

69, route d'esch, Luxembourg, undefined, L-2953, LU

Last Update: 04/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bil.com
761/1000Fair

Founded in 1856, Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) is the oldest multi-business bank in the Grand Duchy. It has played an active role in the main stages of development of the Luxembourg economy. It currently operates in retail, private and corporate banking, as w...

NAICS:522
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1,713
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
LCL

LCL

20, Avenue de Paris, VILLEJUIF, Île-de-France, FR, 94800

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.lcl.fr/
780/1000Fair

Depuis son rapprochement avec le Groupe Crédit Agricole SA en 2003, le périmètre d'activités de LCL, réseau national de banque de détail, est axé sur le marché des particuliers, des professionnels, des entreprises et la Banque privée. LCL est une banque de proximité ...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:16,195
Subsidiaries:46
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL)

Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
LCL

LCL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LCL in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - LCL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LCL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL)

Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
LCL

LCL

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and LCL company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and LCL company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and LCL company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and LCL company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and LCL company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and LCL company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and LCL company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and LCL company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and LCL company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and LCL company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) company and LCL company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) and LCL, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) and LCL, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) or LCL ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) or LCL ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) and LCL, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) and LCL, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-108680
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows any authenticated user to send template notifications by calling POST /sys/api/sendTemplateAnnouncement. Low-privileged attackers can supply forged sender, recipients, title, and template parameters to deliver messages appearing to come from admin or system accounts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108679
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the sendBusAnnouncement handler of SystemApiController that allows any authenticated user to send announcements without the required permissions. Low-privileged attackers can POST crafted bodies to /sys/api/sendBusAnnouncement with forged sender, recipients, title and content to deliver spoofed admin or system messages for phishing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108678
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the queryUserRoles handler of SystemApiController that lets authenticated users read any user's role codes. Low-privileged attackers can send GET requests to /sys/api/queryUserRoles with an arbitrary username to enumerate role assignments and identify administrator accounts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108677
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in GET /sys/api/getUserByName that allows low-privileged authenticated users to retrieve any user's stored password value. Attackers can decrypt the AES-CBC protected response using the hard-coded key exposed by /sys/getEncryptedString to obtain administrators' password ciphertexts for offline guessing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108676
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the SysAnnouncementController downLoadFiles handler that allows low-privileged authenticated users to download announcement attachments. Attackers can supply a known announcement id to retrieve a ZIP of attachments from unreleased announcements or those addressed only to other users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8