Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLCBig Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC
VS
MetLifeMetLife
Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC

Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC

2432 Kemp St, Missoula, MT, 59801, US

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://bigskyuw.com
751/1000Fair

Big Sky Underwriters is a leading independent Managing General Agency located in Missoula, Montana. As a General Agency, we represent many property and casualty insurance companies offering products to individuals and companies delivered solely through retail agents. Ov...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:29
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
MetLife

MetLife

200 Park Ave, New York, NY, US, 10166

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.metlife.com
666/1000Weak

We live in a time of unprecedented change. A time when economies, regulations, and social safety nets are all in flux. Customers around the globe have told us they’re overwhelmed by the pace of change and are looking for a trusted partner to help them manage life’s twi...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:43,494
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC

Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MetLife

MetLife

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MetLife in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MetLife (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MetLife cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC

Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
MetLife

MetLife

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MET851032025
🔒 Incident : Breach
MET502072525
🔒 Incident : Breach
MET636072625

FAQ

Between Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC company and MetLife company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC company and MetLife company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC company and MetLife company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC company and MetLife company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC company and MetLife company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC company and MetLife company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC company and MetLife company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC company and MetLife company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC company and MetLife company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC company and MetLife company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC company and MetLife company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC and MetLife, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC and MetLife, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC or MetLife ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC or MetLife ?
Between Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC and MetLife, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Big Sky Underwriters a Division of Hull & Company, LLC and MetLife, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1