Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Bieser, Greer & Landis, LLP » BIE1768494292

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (BIE1768494292)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-62
Company Score Before Incident751 / 1000
Company Score After Incident689 / 1000
Company LinkView Bieser, Greer & Landis, LLP Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERBIE1768494292
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTOREmail Compromise
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal identifiable information
INCIDENT DATE07/01/2026
STATUSCompleted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Bieser, Greer & Landis, LLP's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Bieser, Greer & Landis, LLP Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Bieser, Greer & Landis, LLP breach identified under incident ID BIE1768494292.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Bieser, Greer & Landis, LLP's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/bieser-greer-&-landis-llp, the number of followers: 348, the industry type: Law Practice and the number of employees: 35 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 751 and after the incident was 689 with a difference of -62 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Bieser, Greer & Landis, LLP and their customers.

On 08 January 2026, Bieser Greer disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Bieser Greer Data Breach".

Bieser Greer reported a data breach where an unauthorized actor gained access to its email accounts, potentially compromising sensitive personal identifiable information.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Email accounts, and exposing Sensitive personal identifiable information.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Mailed data breach notification letters to impacted individuals.

The case underscores how Completed, and recommending next steps like Providing affected individuals with complimentary credit monitoring services, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Mailed data breach notification letters to impacted individuals with details of the breach and complimentary credit monitoring services.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including unauthorized access to its email accounts, and attack vector such as Email Compromise and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized third party may have accessed sensitive PII. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Email Collection: Remote Email Collection (T1114.002) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including unauthorized access to its email accounts, and sensitive PII stored in the compromised emails and Unsecured Credentials: Email Addresses (T1552.008) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including email accounts compromised, and sensitive PII accessed. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Email Collection: Remote Email Collection (T1114.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive personally identifiable information (PII) stored in the compromised emails and Data from Information Repositories: Email Repositories (T1213.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exposed data includes names and Social Security numbers. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized third party may have accessed sensitive PII and Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacting sensitive personal information. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on extent of breach or data manipulation and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to email accounts may imply data tampering. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References