Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-PlymouthBeth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth
VS
Rochester Regional HealthRochester Regional Health
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth

US

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile
766/1000Fair

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth is a non-profit community healthcare facility in Plymouth, Massachusetts. Offering a full slate of services to Plymouth and the surrounding communities of the South Shore - Gateway to Cape Cod. Adjacent to Route 3 at Exit 5 - BID...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:1,203
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Rochester Regional Health

Rochester Regional Health

100 S Kings Hwy, Rochester, New York, US, 14617

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
778/1000Fair

Rochester Regional Health, headquartered in Rochester, NY, is an integrated health services organization serving the people of Western New York, the Finger Lakes, St. Lawrence County, and beyond. We are dedicated to helping our community stay healthy and live fulfilling...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:11,135
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rochester Regional Health

Rochester Regional Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rochester Regional Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rochester Regional Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rochester Regional Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Rochester Regional Health

Rochester Regional Health

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth and Rochester Regional Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth and Rochester Regional Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth or Rochester Regional Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth or Rochester Regional Health ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth and Rochester Regional Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth and Rochester Regional Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44654
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, a shared-agent editor can delete file records through `DELETE /api/files` that the owner has reused across multiple agents. The deletion removes the file globally — not just from the shared agent — breaking the owner's other private agents that reference the same `file_id`. The private agent retains a stale `file_id` reference that no longer resolves. A shared-agent editor can destroy files that the owner uses across multiple agents. The owner's private agents — which the attacker has no access to — break silently with stale `file_id` references. This is a cross-agent integrity violation: editing access to one agent should not affect another. Version 0.8.4 contains a patch.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-44653
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-42507
SUMMARY

When returning errors, functions in the net/textproto package would include its input as part of the error. This might allow an attacker to inject misleading content to errors that are printed or logged.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-42504
SUMMARY

Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-41412
SUMMARY

alf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. Prior to version 2.0-M5-2606, the alf.io extension sandbox injects a fully-functional HTTP client (`simpleHttpClient`) into every extension script's scope. The `postFileAndSaveResponse()` method accepts an arbitrary filesystem path as its `file` parameter and reads the file contents using `new FileInputStream(file)` with no path validation, directory restriction, or allowlist. A malicious extension script can read any file accessible to the JVM process user and exfiltrate it to an attacker-controlled server via HTTP POST. Version 2.0-M5-2606 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2