Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-PlymouthBeth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth
VS
NSW HealthNSW Health
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth

US

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile
766/1000Fair

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth is a non-profit community healthcare facility in Plymouth, Massachusetts. Offering a full slate of services to Plymouth and the surrounding communities of the South Shore - Gateway to Cape Cod. Adjacent to Route 3 at Exit 5 - BID...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:1,203
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NSW Health

NSW Health

1 Reserve Road, St. Leonards, 2065, AU

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.health.nsw.gov.au
761/1000Fair

​​​​​​​With more than 170,000 staff and 228 hospitals, there are millions of ways we are enriching the health of the NSW community every day. In front of a patient, working in a kitchen, developing new treatments, or at a desk, each one of our staff is a vital member o...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:22,758
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NSW Health

NSW Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NSW Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NSW Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NSW Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NSW Health

NSW Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NSW2364123091025
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
NSW13381122

FAQ

Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and NSW Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and NSW Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and NSW Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and NSW Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and NSW Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and NSW Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and NSW Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and NSW Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and NSW Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and NSW Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth company and NSW Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth and NSW Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth and NSW Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth or NSW Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth or NSW Health ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth and NSW Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth and NSW Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44654
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, a shared-agent editor can delete file records through `DELETE /api/files` that the owner has reused across multiple agents. The deletion removes the file globally — not just from the shared agent — breaking the owner's other private agents that reference the same `file_id`. The private agent retains a stale `file_id` reference that no longer resolves. A shared-agent editor can destroy files that the owner uses across multiple agents. The owner's private agents — which the attacker has no access to — break silently with stale `file_id` references. This is a cross-agent integrity violation: editing access to one agent should not affect another. Version 0.8.4 contains a patch.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-44653
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-42507
SUMMARY

When returning errors, functions in the net/textproto package would include its input as part of the error. This might allow an attacker to inject misleading content to errors that are printed or logged.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-42504
SUMMARY

Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-41412
SUMMARY

alf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. Prior to version 2.0-M5-2606, the alf.io extension sandbox injects a fully-functional HTTP client (`simpleHttpClient`) into every extension script's scope. The `postFileAndSaveResponse()` method accepts an arbitrary filesystem path as its `file` parameter and reads the file contents using `new FileInputStream(file)` with no path validation, directory restriction, or allowlist. A malicious extension script can read any file accessible to the JVM process user and exfiltrate it to an attacker-controlled server via HTTP POST. Version 2.0-M5-2606 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2