Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-NeedhamBeth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham
VS
Wellstar Health SystemWellstar Health System
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham

148 Chestnut St, Needham, 02492, US

Last Update: 23/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bidneedham.org
764/1000Fair

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital−Needham (BID−Needham) is a licensed 58-bed acute care community hospital. BID−Needham has served residents in Needham, Newton, Dedham, Dover, Medfield, Sherborn, Wellesley, Westwood and other surrounding communities for more than 100 years...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:466
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Wellstar Health System

Wellstar Health System

Marietta, 30062, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.wellstar.org
760/1000Fair

At Wellstar Health System, our mission is to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. Nationally ranked and locally recognized for our high-quality care, inclusive culture and world-class doctors and caregivers, Wellstar is one of the largest, most in...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:19,733
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Wellstar Health System

Wellstar Health System

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wellstar Health System in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Wellstar Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wellstar Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Wellstar Health System

Wellstar Health System

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
WEL161913522

FAQ

Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Wellstar Health System company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Wellstar Health System company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Wellstar Health System company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Wellstar Health System company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Wellstar Health System company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Wellstar Health System company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Wellstar Health System company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Wellstar Health System company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Wellstar Health System company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Wellstar Health System company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Wellstar Health System company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham and Wellstar Health System, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham and Wellstar Health System, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham or Wellstar Health System ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham or Wellstar Health System ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham and Wellstar Health System, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham and Wellstar Health System, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3