Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-NeedhamBeth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham
VS
Dignity HealthDignity Health
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham

148 Chestnut St, Needham, 02492, US

Last Update: 23/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bidneedham.org
764/1000Fair

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital−Needham (BID−Needham) is a licensed 58-bed acute care community hospital. BID−Needham has served residents in Needham, Newton, Dedham, Dover, Medfield, Sherborn, Wellesley, Westwood and other surrounding communities for more than 100 years...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:466
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Dignity Health

Dignity Health

185 Berry St, San Francisco, 94158, US

Last Update: 12/06/2026

View Profile
692/1000Weak

We provide quality, compassionate health care at more than 40 hospitals and care centers that are serving communities across California, Arizona and Nevada every minute of every day. And while not everyone may live near a major medical facility, Dignity Health is making...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:32,463
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Dignity Health

Dignity Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Dignity Health has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Dignity Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dignity Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Dignity Health

Dignity Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DIGST-CLI1781224155
🔒 Incident : Breach
DIG5762157091125
🔒 Incident : Breach
DIG328072625

FAQ

Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Dignity Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Dignity Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Dignity Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Dignity Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Dignity Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Dignity Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Dignity Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Dignity Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Dignity Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Dignity Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham company and Dignity Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham and Dignity Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham and Dignity Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham or Dignity Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham or Dignity Health ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham and Dignity Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham and Dignity Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94426
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.5.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /jobgroup/insert. This manipulation of the argument Name causes cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-94425
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Moore Threads MTT S80 Driver Package 340.150. The affected element is the function sub_140006F0C in the library mtdispkm64.sys of the component IOCTL Handler. The manipulation results in improper privilege management. Attacking locally is a requirement. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2
CVE-2026-94627
SUMMARY

vLLM Mooncake connector through 0.29.0 fails to properly manage GPU KV cache block ownership when concurrent child requests share a single transfer ID in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Attackers can trigger GPU memory exhaustion by submitting completion requests with multiple prompts, causing orphaned KV cache blocks to accumulate until process restart and eventually preventing legitimate requests from executing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94626
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to validate the tp_size parameter in kv_transfer_params on OpenAI-compatible completion endpoints, allowing attackers to allocate unbounded memory. Attackers can supply arbitrary tp_size values in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments to exhaust memory and trigger kernel OOM-kill of the decode worker process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94625
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in MooncakeConnector where rejected prefill requests create ownerless transfer placeholders that are never reclaimed. Attackers can send rejected requests to exhaust sender task pools, causing valid requests to be delayed by up to 480 seconds while health checks continue returning success.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9