Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York)BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York)
VS
Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChilePontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York)

BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York)

160 Convent Ave, New York, New York, 10031, US

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://bic-ccny.org/
768/1000Fair

WELCOME to BIC -- a 36-credit, portfolio-driven master's degree program in BRANDING + INTEGRATED COMMUNICATIONS that combines theory and practice in an interdisciplinary, multi-tracked curriculum that addresses the opportunities and needs of marketing communications ind...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:15
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Avda. Libertador Bernardo OHiggins 340, Santiago, 8320000, CL

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.uc.cl/
805/1000Good

Founded in 1888, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile is currently one of the leading higher education institutions in Latin America. Approximately 22,000 students are enrolled in graduate and undergraduate programs, which encompass a wide range of disciplines an...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:13,981
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York)

BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York)

BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) or Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) or Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile ?
Between BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BIC at CCNY (Branding + Integrated Communications at The City College of New York) and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1