Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BI-LOBI-LO
VS
JumboJumbo
BI-LO

BI-LO

5050 Edgewood Court, None, Jacksonville, Florida, US, 32254

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.bi-lo.com
740/1000Moderate

About BI-LO Originally founded in 1961 by Frank Outlaw, BI-LO grocery stores and in-store pharmacies serve communities throughout three southeastern states - Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina. BI-LO, LLC is a subsidiary of Southeastern Grocers, which is one of ...

NAICS:44511
NAICS Definition:Supermarkets and Other Grocery (except Convenience) Stores
Employees:1,842
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Jumbo

Jumbo

Av Kennedy, Santiago, 83335, CL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jumbo.cl
773/1000Fair

Con un tamaño promedio de 8.250 m2, Hipermercados Jumbo ofrece un variado surtido de productos, que incluye alimentos, abarrotes y una amplia gama de artículos no comestibles, como vestuario, elementos para el hogar y electrodomésticos. Además de las marcas tradicionale...

NAICS:44511
NAICS Definition:Supermarkets and Other Grocery (except Convenience) Stores
Employees:12,158
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BI-LO

BI-LO

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Jumbo

Jumbo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Groceries Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BI-LO in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Groceries Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jumbo in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BI-LO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BI-LO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Jumbo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jumbo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BI-LO

BI-LO

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BI-952072925
Jumbo

Jumbo

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BI-LO company and Jumbo company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BI-LO company and Jumbo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BI-LO company and Jumbo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BI-LO company and Jumbo company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BI-LO company and Jumbo company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BI-LO company and Jumbo company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BI-LO company and Jumbo company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BI-LO company and Jumbo company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BI-LO company and Jumbo company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BI-LO company and Jumbo company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BI-LO company and Jumbo company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BI-LO and Jumbo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BI-LO and Jumbo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BI-LO or Jumbo ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BI-LO or Jumbo ?
Between BI-LO and Jumbo, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BI-LO and Jumbo, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1