Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BHPBHP
VS
Tata SteelTata Steel
BHP

BHP

171 Collins Street, Melbourne, 3000, AU

Last Update: 27/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.bhp.com/
800/1000Good

We are supplying the resources the world needs to help build a better, clearer future. Copper for renewable energy. Potash for sustainable farming. Iron ore and metallurgical coal for the steel needed for global infrastructure and the energy transition. #FutureIsClear ...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:40,388
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Tata Steel

Tata Steel

Bombay House, 24, Homi Mody Street, Mumbai, 400001, IN

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.tatasteel.com
802/1000Good

Tata Steel group is among the top global steel companies with an annual crude steel capacity of 34 million tonnes per annum. It is one of the world's most geographically-diversified steel producers, with operations and commercial presence across the world. The group (ex...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:56,276
Subsidiaries:76
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BHP

BHP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tata Steel

Tata Steel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

BHP has 60.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Steel in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BHP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BHP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tata Steel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Steel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BHP

BHP

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TELKIWALDBHP1783413728
Tata Steel

Tata Steel

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BHP company and Tata Steel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BHP company and Tata Steel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BHP company and Tata Steel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BHP company and Tata Steel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BHP company and Tata Steel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BHP company and Tata Steel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BHP company and Tata Steel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BHP company and Tata Steel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BHP company and Tata Steel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BHP company and Tata Steel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BHP company and Tata Steel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BHP and Tata Steel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BHP and Tata Steel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BHP or Tata Steel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BHP or Tata Steel ?
Between BHP and Tata Steel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BHP and Tata Steel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57990
SUMMARY

Files or directories accessible to external parties in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57989
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57978
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-17497
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 grants the Tauri shell plugin shell:allow-execute capability for bash, python, and python3 with arbitrary arguments in the default desktop capabilities. JavaScript running in the application webview can therefore invoke plugin:shell|execute to run attacker-controlled operating system commands with the privileges of the NoteGen process. In combination with script execution in the webview (for example via chat XSS), this enables full remote code execution on the user's machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-17496
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 renders AI chat responses with markdown-it configured with html:true and injects the result into the DOM via dangerouslySetInnerHTML in chat-preview, without HTML sanitization and with CSP set to null. Attacker-controlled content that reaches the model prompt (for example a malicious skill REFERENCE.md that instructs the model to emit HTML) can cause the model response to include executable markup such as an img onerror handler. When the user views the chat response, that markup runs as JavaScript in the privileged Tauri webview, enabling arbitrary script execution in the application context (cross-site scripting).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8