Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BFL Leasing GmbHBFL Leasing GmbH
VS
BB&TBB&T
BFL Leasing GmbH

BFL Leasing GmbH

Mergenthalerallee 42, Eschborn, 65760, DE

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bfl-leasing.de
752/1000Fair

Die BFL Leasing ist Spezialist für Absatzförderungen. Seit über 45 Jahren entwickelt die BFL Leasing GmbH, passgenaue Finanzierungslösungen für Handels- und Systemhäuser sowie Hersteller der IT, Medizin- und Bürotechnik. Flexibel, schnell und unbürokratisch. Gemeinsam m...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:7
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
BB&T

BB&T

214 North Tryon Street, Charlotte, NC, undefined, US

Last Update: 16/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bbt.com
777/1000Fair

We’d love to stay connected with you! Please follow our Truist company page and unfollow this page which is no longer active. BB&T and SunTrust formed Truist with a shared purpose—to inspire and build better lives and communities. With our combined resources, collectiv...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:13,573
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BFL Leasing GmbH

BFL Leasing GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BB&T

BB&T

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BFL Leasing GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BB&T in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BFL Leasing GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BFL Leasing GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BB&T (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BB&T cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BFL Leasing GmbH

BFL Leasing GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
BB&T

BB&T

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BFL Leasing GmbH company and BB&T company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BFL Leasing GmbH company and BB&T company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BFL Leasing GmbH company and BB&T company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BFL Leasing GmbH company and BB&T company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BFL Leasing GmbH company and BB&T company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BFL Leasing GmbH company and BB&T company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BFL Leasing GmbH company and BB&T company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BFL Leasing GmbH company and BB&T company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BFL Leasing GmbH company and BB&T company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BFL Leasing GmbH company and BB&T company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BFL Leasing GmbH company and BB&T company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BFL Leasing GmbH and BB&T, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BFL Leasing GmbH and BB&T, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BFL Leasing GmbH or BB&T ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BFL Leasing GmbH or BB&T ?
Between BFL Leasing GmbH and BB&T, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BFL Leasing GmbH and BB&T, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3