Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bezirkssparkasse ReichenauBezirkssparkasse Reichenau
VS
SicoobSicoob
Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau

Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau

Abt-Berno-Straße 1, Reichenau, 78479, DE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.spk-reichenau.de
756/1000Fair

Mit unseren über 160 Mitarbeitenden bewegen wir eine Bilanzsumme von 1,6 Mrd. EUR. Damit sind wir effizienter Finanzpartner unserer Kunden. Wir bieten Lösungen rund ums private und geschäftliche Bankgeschäft. Besonders spezialisert sind wir auf die Finanzierung des wohn...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:31
Subsidiaries:63
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sicoob

Sicoob

SIG Quadra 6 Lote 2080, Brasília, DF, BR, 70610-460

Last Update: 29/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.sicoob.com.br/
793/1000Fair

O Sicoob é o maior sistema financeiro cooperativo do país, com mais de 9 milhões de cooperados e mais de 4,6 mil pontos de atendimento distribuídos em todo o Brasil. Somos uma cooperativa financeira que oferece aos cooperados serviços de conta corrente, crédito, investi...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:15,441
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau

Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sicoob

Sicoob

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Sicoob has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sicoob (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sicoob cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau

Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sicoob

Sicoob

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SOCSIC1780057768

FAQ

Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Sicoob company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Sicoob company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Sicoob company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Sicoob company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Sicoob company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Sicoob company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Sicoob company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Sicoob company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Sicoob company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Sicoob company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Sicoob company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau and Sicoob, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau and Sicoob, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau or Sicoob ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau or Sicoob ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau and Sicoob, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau and Sicoob, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1