Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bezirk MarchBezirk March
VS
Ville de MontréalVille de Montréal
Bezirk March

Bezirk March

Lachen, 8853, CH

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.bezirk-march.ch
745/1000Moderate

Der Bezirk March ist in seiner heutigen Gestalt das Ergebnis der Landsgemeinde von 1848, an der die Kantonsverfassung angenommen wurde. Der Bezirk March besteht aus den neun Gemeinden Altendorf, Lachen, Galgenen, Innerthal, Vorderthal, Wangen, Tuggen, Reichenburg und S...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:31
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Ville de Montréal

Ville de Montréal

275, rue Notre Dame Est, Montréal, H2Y 1C6, CA

Last Update: 29/07/2026

View Profile
719/1000Moderate

Montréal est la plus grande ville francophone d’Amérique et elle se distingue par sa vitalité culturelle exceptionnelle et des forces créatrices reconnues mondialement. Elle se développe un peu plus chaque jour en une ville contemporaine, inclusive et dynamique sur ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:12,282
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bezirk March

Bezirk March

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ville de Montréal

Ville de Montréal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bezirk March in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

Ville de Montréal has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Bezirk March (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bezirk March cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ville de Montréal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ville de Montréal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bezirk March

Bezirk March

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BEZ23429124
Ville de Montréal

Ville de Montréal

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
VIL1785335027

FAQ

Between Bezirk March company and Ville de Montréal company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bezirk March company and Ville de Montréal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bezirk March company and Ville de Montréal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bezirk March company and Ville de Montréal company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bezirk March company and Ville de Montréal company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bezirk March company and Ville de Montréal company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bezirk March company and Ville de Montréal company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bezirk March company and Ville de Montréal company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bezirk March company and Ville de Montréal company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bezirk March company and Ville de Montréal company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bezirk March company and Ville de Montréal company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bezirk March and Ville de Montréal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bezirk March and Ville de Montréal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bezirk March or Ville de Montréal ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bezirk March or Ville de Montréal ?
Between Bezirk March and Ville de Montréal, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bezirk March and Ville de Montréal, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-80138
SUMMARY

ClipBucket V5's web installer fails to properly validate or escape the php_cli_filepath parameter before passing it to shell execution. Unauthenticated attackers can submit a crafted POST request to the installer with a malicious php_cli_filepath value to execute arbitrary commands as the web server user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-79912
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in TOTOLINK N600R 4.3.0cu.7647_B20210106. The impacted element is the function getCurrentTime of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Performing a manipulation of the argument ntp_server results in command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-79911
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in TOTOLINK N600R 4.3.0cu.7647_B20210106. The affected element is the function setSystemConfig of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. Such manipulation of the argument Hostname leads to stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS2
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-70665
SUMMARY

Doorkeeper OpenID Connect implements an OpenID Connect authentication provider for Rails applications on top of Doorkeeper. Prior to 1.10.4, the Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) endpoint persists client-supplied scopes without validating them against the server's configured scope set. Under certain conditions, this allows a self-registered client to obtain scopes beyond what the server intended to grant. In DynamicClientRegistrationController#application_params, the scopes attribute is assigned directly from params[:scope] with no validation against Doorkeeper.configuration.scopes or optional_scopes. Combined with enforce_configured_scopes being off by default and Doorkeeper's ScopeChecker prioritizing application-level scopes over server-level scopes, this creates a privilege escalation path. This issue is fixed in version 1.10.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-55805
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Drupal core allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Drupal core versions: from 0.0.0 to 10.6.13, from 11.3.0 to 11.3.14, from 11.4.0 to 11.4.4, from 0.0.0 to 11.0.*, from 0.0.0 to 11.1.*, from 0.0.0 to 11.2.*.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA