Comparison Overview

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

VS

Scripps Health

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, US, 02215
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) is part of Beth Israel Lahey Health, a new health care system that brings together academic medical centers and teaching hospitals, community and specialty hospitals, more than 4,000 physicians and 35,000 employees in a shared mission to expand access to great care and advance the science and practice of medicine through groundbreaking research and education. BIDMC is a world-class teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School and is located in the heart of Boston. We are passionate about caring for our patients like they are family, finding new cures, using the finest and the latest technologies, and teaching and inspiring caregivers of tomorrow. We put people at the center of everything we do, because we believe in medicine that puts people first. Interested in a career at BIDMC? Check out www.jobs.bidmc.org.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,690
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Scripps Health

10140 Campus Point Dr, None, San Diego, California, US, 92121
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 650 and 699

Care You Can Count On Whether you are searching for your next career opportunity or looking for care for yourself or a family member, you’ll find what you need at Scripps. Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps is a non-profit integrated health care delivery system based in San Diego, Calif. We treat more than 700,000 patients annually through the dedication of 3,000 affiliated physicians and more than 15,000 employees among our five acute-care hospital campuses, hospice and home health care services, 27 outpatient centers and clinics, and hundreds of affiliated physician offices throughout the region. Medical Excellence Every Step of the Way Recognized as a leader in disease and injury prevention, diagnosis and treatment, Scripps has been ranked four times as one of the nation’s best health care systems by Truven Health Analytics. Our hospitals are consistently ranked by U.S. News & World Report among the nation’s best – and Scripps is regularly recognized by Fortune, Working Mother magazine and The Advisory Board as one of the best places in the nation to work. Scripps is also at the forefront of clinical research, genomic medicine and wireless health care. With three highly respected graduate medical education programs, Scripps is a longstanding member of the Association of American Medical Colleges. More information can be found at www.scripps.org.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,475
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beth-israel-deaconess-medical-center.jpeg
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scripps-health.jpeg
Scripps Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Scripps Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scripps Health in 2025.

Incident History — Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Scripps Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scripps Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beth-israel-deaconess-medical-center.jpeg
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scripps-health.jpeg
Scripps Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Scripps Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Scripps Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center company has not reported any.

In the current year, Scripps Health company and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Scripps Health company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Scripps Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Scripps Health company nor Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center company nor Scripps Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center nor Scripps Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Scripps Health company.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center company employs more people globally than Scripps Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center nor Scripps Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center nor Scripps Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center nor Scripps Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center nor Scripps Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center nor Scripps Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center nor Scripps Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H