Comparison Overview
Best Buy

Best Buy
7601 Penn Ave South, Richfield, 55423-3645, US
Last Update: 04/04/2026
At Best Buy, our purpose is to enrich lives through technology. We do that by leveraging our unique combination of tech expertise and human touch to meet our customers’ everyday needs, whether they come to us online, visit our stores or invite us into their homes. With ...

MAP Group Asia
Sahid Sudirman Center, Jakarta, 10220, ID
Last Update: 01/04/2026
MAP Group Asia is Indonesia’s leading retail organization with an expanding presence across Southeast Asia. Our diverse portfolio includes Sports, Fashion, Digital, Department Stores, Kids, Food & Beverage, and Lifestyle. As a market leader, we are committed to buildin...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Best Buy







MAP Group Asia






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
Best Buy has 48.19% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MAP Group Asia in 2026.
Incident History - Best Buy (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Best Buy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - MAP Group Asia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MAP Group Asia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Best Buy

MAP Group Asia
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.