Comparison Overview
Berkeley | Leading Complex Projects

Berkeley | Leading Complex Projects
Berkeley, US
Last Update: 08/12/2025
Large-scale projects are essential for maintaining competitiveness and fostering innovation, regardless of the industry; however, they are also costly, time-consuming, and prone to mismanagement. Leading such projects requires more than just understanding of their objec...

Brigham Young University
Main Campus, Provo, UT, US, 84602
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We believe a world yearning for hope and joy needs the graduates of Brigham Young University—disciples of Jesus Christ who are driven by love for God and His children and who are prepared to serve and lead. This preparation demands a unique university model: at BYU, bel...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Berkeley | Leading Complex Projects







Brigham Young University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Berkeley | Leading Complex Projects in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Brigham Young University in 2026.
Incident History - Berkeley | Leading Complex Projects (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Berkeley | Leading Complex Projects cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Brigham Young University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Brigham Young University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Berkeley | Leading Complex Projects

Brigham Young University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.