Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bentley MotorsBentley Motors
VS
FerrariFerrari
Bentley Motors

Bentley Motors

Bentley Motors Ltd, Crewe, CW1 3PL, GB

Last Update: 15/03/2026

View Profile

Bentley Motors is the definitive British car company, dedicated to developing and crafting the world's most desirable cars. In 1919, a simple aluminium paperweight inspired a pioneering British engineer. His ideas took the automotive world by storm, creating an endurin...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:4,316
Subsidiaries:48
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Ferrari

Ferrari

Abetone inferiore, Maranello, 41053, IT

Last Update: 09/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ferrari.com
747/1000Moderate

Ferrari's story officially began in 1947 when its first road car, the 125 S, emerged from the gate of no. 4 Via Abetone Inferiore in Maranello. The iconic two-seater went on to win the Rome Grand Prix later that year and shortly thereafter was developed into a refined G...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:13,830
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bentley Motors

Bentley Motors

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ferrari

Ferrari

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bentley Motors in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ferrari in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bentley Motors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bentley Motors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ferrari (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ferrari cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bentley Motors

Bentley Motors

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SEASKOBENPORVOLAUTVOL1770202467
Ferrari

Ferrari

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FER41121023
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
FER1940251122
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FER41012522

FAQ

Between Bentley Motors company and Ferrari company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bentley Motors company and Ferrari company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bentley Motors company and Ferrari company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bentley Motors company and Ferrari company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bentley Motors company and Ferrari company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bentley Motors company and Ferrari company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bentley Motors company and Ferrari company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bentley Motors company and Ferrari company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bentley Motors company and Ferrari company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bentley Motors company and Ferrari company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bentley Motors company and Ferrari company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bentley Motors and Ferrari, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bentley Motors and Ferrari, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bentley Motors or Ferrari ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bentley Motors or Ferrari ?
Between Bentley Motors and Ferrari, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bentley Motors and Ferrari, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3