Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Benefit Allocation Systems, LLCBenefit Allocation Systems, LLC
VS
SnowflakeSnowflake
Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC

Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC

640 Freedom Business Center Drive, King of Prussia, 19406, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.BASusa.com
726/1000Moderate

Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC. ("BAS"​) is the developer of MyEnroll.com – leading, web-based employee benefits administration for enrollment, COBRA/HIPAA, Flexible Spending Accounts (FSA), Health Reimbursement Accounts (HRA) and Professional Learning Accounts. BAS de...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:54
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Snowflake

Snowflake

The Cloud, US

Last Update: 14/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.snowflake.com
100/1000Critical

**Snowflake is proud to be the Official Data Collaboration Provider for LA28 and Team USA.** Snowflake delivers the AI Data Cloud — a global network where thousands of organizations mobilize data with near-unlimited scale, concurrency, and performance. Inside the AI Da...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:12,567
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
7
Known data breaches
20
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC

Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Snowflake

Snowflake

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Snowflake has 579.61% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Snowflake (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Snowflake cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC

Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BEN020090625
Snowflake

Snowflake

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEN1779855877
🔒 Incident : Breach
ROCANOSNO1776126436
🔒 Incident : Breach
ANO1775660105

FAQ

Between Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC company and Snowflake company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC company and Snowflake company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC company and Snowflake company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC company and Snowflake company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC company and Snowflake company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC and Snowflake, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC and Snowflake, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC or Snowflake ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC or Snowflake ?
Between Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC and Snowflake, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Benefit Allocation Systems, LLC and Snowflake, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA