Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaisetBenecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset
VS
DanoneDanone
Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset

Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset

Raisionkaari 55, Raisio, 21200, FI

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
747/1000Moderate

BenecolHCPFIN - Tee tilaa kolesterolia alentavalle täydennykselle potilaittesi ruokavalioon- Virallinen Benecol®-sivusto terveydenhuollon ammattilaisille

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Danone

Danone

17 boulevard Haussmann, Paris, 75000, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.danone.com
807/1000Good

Danone is a leading global food and beverage company operating in three health-focused, fast-growing, and on-trend Categories: Essential Dairy & Plant-Based products, Waters, and Specialized Nutrition. With a long-standing mission of bringing health through food to as...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:70,667
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset

Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Danone

Danone

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Danone in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Danone (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danone cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset

Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Danone

Danone

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset company and Danone company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset company and Danone company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset company and Danone company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset company and Danone company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset company and Danone company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset company and Danone company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset company and Danone company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset company and Danone company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset company and Danone company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset company and Danone company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset company and Danone company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset and Danone, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset and Danone, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset or Danone ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset or Danone ?
Between Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset and Danone, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Benecol - Terveydenhuollon ammattilaiset and Danone, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2