Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Benton County, WA GovernmentBenton County, WA Government
VS
Department of Health (Philippines)Department of Health (Philippines)
Benton County, WA Government

Benton County, WA Government

620 Market St, Prosser, 99350, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.co.benton.wa.us
740/1000Moderate

Benton County is located in south-central Washington. The county seat is located in Prosser, and its largest city is Kennewick. Benton County was created on March 8, 1905 and was named after U.S. Senator Thomas Hart Benton. Benton County operates under the plural execut...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:83
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Department of Health (Philippines)

Department of Health (Philippines)

San Lazaro Compound, Rizal Avenue, Santa Cruz, Manila City, 1014, PH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.doh.gov.ph/
782/1000Fair

The Philippine Department of Health (abbreviated as DOH; Filipino: Kagawaran ng Kalusugan) is the executive department of the Philippine government responsible for ensuring access to basic public health services by all Filipinos through the provision of quality health c...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:35,478
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Benton County, WA Government

Benton County, WA Government

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Department of Health (Philippines)

Department of Health (Philippines)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Benton County, WA Government in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Department of Health (Philippines) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Benton County, WA Government (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Benton County, WA Government cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Department of Health (Philippines) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Department of Health (Philippines) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Benton County, WA Government

Benton County, WA Government

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BEN234082125
Department of Health (Philippines)

Department of Health (Philippines)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Benton County, WA Government company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Benton County, WA Government company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Benton County, WA Government company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Benton County, WA Government company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Benton County, WA Government company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Benton County, WA Government company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Benton County, WA Government company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Benton County, WA Government company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Benton County, WA Government company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Benton County, WA Government company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Benton County, WA Government company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Benton County, WA Government and Department of Health (Philippines), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Benton County, WA Government and Department of Health (Philippines), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Benton County, WA Government or Department of Health (Philippines) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Benton County, WA Government or Department of Health (Philippines) ?
Between Benton County, WA Government and Department of Health (Philippines), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Benton County, WA Government and Department of Health (Philippines), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8