Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e SaúdeMonitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde
VS
Smart FitSmart Fit
Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde

Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde

Av. Affonso Penna, Curitiba, 82530-280, BR

Last Update: 16/12/2025

View Profile
766/1000Fair

O objetivo desse programa é reduzir os fatores de risco e estabilizar doenças crônicas não transmissíveis. Nosso programa conta com um conjunto de ações individualizadas, que combinam telemonitoramento, visitas presenciais multidisciplinares e disponibilidade de um cana...

NAICS:71394
NAICS Definition:Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:82
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Smart Fit

Smart Fit

Avenida Paulista 1294, São Paulo, BR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.smartfit.com.br
796/1000Fair

Somos o Grupo Smart Fit, a força que ativa o seu potencial. Um ecossistema em constante evolução que une tecnologia, propósito e performance para transformar o fitness, e a vida das pessoas, em movimento real. Com mais de 22 mil colaboradores e colaboradoras em 16 país...

NAICS:71394
NAICS Definition:Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees:13,938
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde

Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Smart Fit

Smart Fit

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smart Fit in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Smart Fit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smart Fit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde

Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Smart Fit

Smart Fit

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde company and Smart Fit company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde company and Smart Fit company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde company and Smart Fit company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde company and Smart Fit company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde company and Smart Fit company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde company and Smart Fit company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde company and Smart Fit company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde company and Smart Fit company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde company and Smart Fit company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde company and Smart Fit company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde company and Smart Fit company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde and Smart Fit, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde and Smart Fit, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde or Smart Fit ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde or Smart Fit ?
Between Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde and Smart Fit, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Monitoramento de Crônicos/Bem-Estar e Saúde and Smart Fit, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2