Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

British Pullman, A Belmond TrainBritish Pullman, A Belmond Train
VS
Costa Crociere S.p.A.Costa Crociere S.p.A.
British Pullman, A Belmond Train

British Pullman, A Belmond Train

Victoria Station, Victoria Street, London, SW1E 5ND, GB

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile

Whisking guests away on escapes around the UK, the British Pullman combines sumptuous art deco interiors with decadent dining and a palpable spirit of joie de vivre. Expect luxury, glamour and a dash of adventure on an unforgettable trip through the British countryside....

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:21
Subsidiaries:103
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Costa Crociere S.p.A.

Costa Crociere S.p.A.

Piazza Piccapietra 48, Genova, IT, 16121

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
785/1000Fair

Costa belongs to the Carnival Corporation & plc Group, listed on the London and New York stock exchanges, the largest cruise company in the world. Costa, the only Italian cruise company flying the Italian flag, has been sailing the world’s seas for more than 75 years,...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:11,307
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
British Pullman, A Belmond Train

British Pullman, A Belmond Train

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Costa Crociere S.p.A.

Costa Crociere S.p.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for British Pullman, A Belmond Train in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Costa Crociere S.p.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - British Pullman, A Belmond Train (X = Date, Y = Severity)

British Pullman, A Belmond Train cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Costa Crociere S.p.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Costa Crociere S.p.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
British Pullman, A Belmond Train

British Pullman, A Belmond Train

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Costa Crociere S.p.A.

Costa Crociere S.p.A.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between British Pullman, A Belmond Train company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between British Pullman, A Belmond Train company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between British Pullman, A Belmond Train company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between British Pullman, A Belmond Train company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between British Pullman, A Belmond Train company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between British Pullman, A Belmond Train company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between British Pullman, A Belmond Train company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between British Pullman, A Belmond Train company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between British Pullman, A Belmond Train company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between British Pullman, A Belmond Train company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between British Pullman, A Belmond Train company and Costa Crociere S.p.A. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between British Pullman, A Belmond Train and Costa Crociere S.p.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between British Pullman, A Belmond Train and Costa Crociere S.p.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - British Pullman, A Belmond Train or Costa Crociere S.p.A. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - British Pullman, A Belmond Train or Costa Crociere S.p.A. ?
Between British Pullman, A Belmond Train and Costa Crociere S.p.A., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between British Pullman, A Belmond Train and Costa Crociere S.p.A., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA