Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Castello di Casole, A Belmond HotelCastello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel
VS
Delaware NorthDelaware North
Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel

Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel

Località Querceto, Casole d’Elsa, 53031, IT

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

A former 10th century castle, Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel, Tuscany retains the ambience of a private country house, with 39 suites. It is a gateway to the wonders of rural Italy – rolling hills, olive groves, and vineyards – as well as Tuscan towns Siena, Floren...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:87
Subsidiaries:100
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Delaware North

Delaware North

250 Delaware Ave, Buffalo, 14202, US

Last Update: 08/06/2026

View Profile
319/1000Critical

Delaware North is a global leader in the hospitality and entertainment industry. The company annually serves more than a half-billion guests across three continents, including at high-profile sports venues, airports, national and state parks, restaurants, resorts, hotel...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:13,201
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel

Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Delaware North

Delaware North

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

Delaware North has 88.68% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Delaware North (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Delaware North cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel

Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Delaware North

Delaware North

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEL1780946592
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CONTEXDEL1770338879
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CON2293322103125

FAQ

Between Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel company and Delaware North company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel company and Delaware North company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel company and Delaware North company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel company and Delaware North company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel company and Delaware North company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel company and Delaware North company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel company and Delaware North company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel company and Delaware North company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel company and Delaware North company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel company and Delaware North company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel company and Delaware North company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel and Delaware North, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel and Delaware North, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel or Delaware North ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel or Delaware North ?
Between Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel and Delaware North, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Castello di Casole, A Belmond Hotel and Delaware North, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2