Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERSBELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS
VS
Life Insurance Corporation of IndiaLife Insurance Corporation of India
BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS

BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS

114 W. Magnolia Street #505, BELLINGHAM, Washington, 98225, US

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://bell-uw.com
752/1000Fair

Bellingham Underwriters, a Division of Arrowhead General Insurance Agency, Inc. is a long established underwriting management firm located in beautiful Bellingham, Washington. Originally a branch office of a larger MGA, the doors first opened in 1997 under the directio...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:25
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Life Insurance Corporation of India

Life Insurance Corporation of India

Jeevan Bima Marg, Mumbai, 400021, IN

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://licindia.in/home
811/1000Good

The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) is a state-owned Life Insurance Company of India. Founded in 1956, it operates as a Government-Owned Corporation, headquartered in Mumbai, Maharashtra, and is a key player in the life insurance sector in India. LIC offers a...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:73,234
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS

BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Life Insurance Corporation of India

Life Insurance Corporation of India

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Life Insurance Corporation of India in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Life Insurance Corporation of India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Life Insurance Corporation of India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS

BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Life Insurance Corporation of India

Life Insurance Corporation of India

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Life Insurance Corporation of India company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Life Insurance Corporation of India company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Life Insurance Corporation of India company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Life Insurance Corporation of India company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Life Insurance Corporation of India company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Life Insurance Corporation of India company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Life Insurance Corporation of India company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Life Insurance Corporation of India company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Life Insurance Corporation of India company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Life Insurance Corporation of India company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Life Insurance Corporation of India company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS and Life Insurance Corporation of India, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS and Life Insurance Corporation of India, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS or Life Insurance Corporation of India ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS or Life Insurance Corporation of India ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS and Life Insurance Corporation of India, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS and Life Insurance Corporation of India, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1