Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERSBELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS
VS
ChubbChubb
BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS

BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS

114 W. Magnolia Street #505, BELLINGHAM, Washington, 98225, US

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://bell-uw.com
752/1000Fair

Bellingham Underwriters, a Division of Arrowhead General Insurance Agency, Inc. is a long established underwriting management firm located in beautiful Bellingham, Washington. Originally a branch office of a larger MGA, the doors first opened in 1997 under the directio...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:25
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Chubb

Chubb

Bärengasse 32, CH-8001, CH

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.chubb.com/
826/1000Good

Chubb is a world leader in insurance. With operations in 54 countries and territories, Chubb provides commercial and personal property and casualty insurance, personal accident and supplemental health insurance, reinsurance and life insurance to a diverse group of clien...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:42,030
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS

BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Chubb

Chubb

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chubb in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Chubb (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chubb cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS

BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Chubb

Chubb

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Chubb company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Chubb company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Chubb company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Chubb company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Chubb company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Chubb company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Chubb company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Chubb company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Chubb company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Chubb company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS company and Chubb company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS and Chubb, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS and Chubb, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS or Chubb ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS or Chubb ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS and Chubb, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BELLINGHAM UNDERWRITERS and Chubb, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2