Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of ManchesterBusiness Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester
VS
University of Missouri SystemUniversity of Missouri System
Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester

Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester

Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, GB

Last Update: 21/02/2026

View Profile

Whether you’re an international blue chip, an ambitious SME, or a charity with an eye for innovation, a partnership with The University of Manchester can have a significant impact on your organisation. The University provides a broad range of support mechanisms to help...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of Missouri System

University of Missouri System

1100 Carrie Francke Drive, Columbia, 65211, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.umsystem.edu/
773/1000Fair

The University of Missouri System has provided teaching, research and service to Missouri and the nation since 1839. The university was the first publicly supported institution of higher education established in the Louisiana Purchase territory. Its philosophy of educa...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:26,468
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester

Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Missouri System

University of Missouri System

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Missouri System in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Missouri System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Missouri System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester

Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of Missouri System

University of Missouri System

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
UNI306072825

FAQ

Between Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester company and University of Missouri System company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester company and University of Missouri System company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester company and University of Missouri System company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester company and University of Missouri System company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester company and University of Missouri System company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester company and University of Missouri System company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester company and University of Missouri System company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester company and University of Missouri System company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester company and University of Missouri System company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester company and University of Missouri System company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester company and University of Missouri System company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester and University of Missouri System, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester and University of Missouri System, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester or University of Missouri System ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester or University of Missouri System ?
Between Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester and University of Missouri System, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Business Engagement and Knowledge Exchange – The University of Manchester and University of Missouri System, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16197
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. The affected element is the function handleMessageReceive of the file pkg/channels/feishu/feishu_64.go of the component Group Message Handler. Such manipulation leads to missing authorization. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inactivity.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-16196
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. Impacted is the function isPrivateOrRestrictedIP of the file pkg/tools/integration/web.go of the component web_fetch. This manipulation causes server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Patch name: 2efbe5d560e7ed9bc5209c203dc4aa6ecdbc7405. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-16195
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. This issue affects the function dispatchIncoming of the file pkg/channels/wecom/wecom.go of the component Group Message Handler. The manipulation results in incorrect authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inactivity.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-10130
SUMMARY

QueryWeaver contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain valid session tokens for existing accounts by submitting a signup request with a known victim email address. The signup route unconditionally creates and links a new token to the matching Identity via a Cypher MERGE operation before checking whether the email belongs to an existing account, causing the server to return a valid authenticated session token for the victim's identity without requiring any prior credentials or user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-16194
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in zhayujie CowAgent up to 2.1.1. This affects the function WebFetch.execute of the file agent/tools/web_fetch/web_fetch.py. Executing a manipulation of the argument url can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. Upgrading to version 2.1.2 is able to mitigate this issue. This patch is called ea47f3097eed4f8295c4cb3d76ecb97e0f43d632. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The vendor was contacted early, responded in a very professional manner and quickly released a fixed version of the affected product.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8