Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BECM Banque Européenne Crédit MutuelBECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel
VS
Standard CharteredStandard Chartered
BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel

BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel

4, rue Frédéric-Guillaume Raiffeisen, Strasbourg, 67913, FR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.becm.fr
755/1000Fair

An active Corporate bank, backed by a solid banking group.

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:405
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Standard Chartered

Standard Chartered

1 Basinghall Avenue, London, EC2V 5DD, GB

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.sc.com
804/1000Good

We are a leading international banking group, with a presence in 54 of the world’s most dynamic markets. Our purpose is to drive commerce and prosperity through our unique diversity, and our heritage and values are expressed in our brand promise, here for good. If you...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:78,279
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel

BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Standard Chartered

Standard Chartered

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Standard Chartered in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Standard Chartered (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Standard Chartered cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel

BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Standard Chartered

Standard Chartered

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
STA173851123

FAQ

Between BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel company and Standard Chartered company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel company and Standard Chartered company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel company and Standard Chartered company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel company and Standard Chartered company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel company and Standard Chartered company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel company and Standard Chartered company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel company and Standard Chartered company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel company and Standard Chartered company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel company and Standard Chartered company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel company and Standard Chartered company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel company and Standard Chartered company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel and Standard Chartered, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel and Standard Chartered, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel or Standard Chartered ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel or Standard Chartered ?
Between BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel and Standard Chartered, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BECM Banque Européenne Crédit Mutuel and Standard Chartered, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2