Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - ChinaBeckman Coulter Life Sciences - China
VS
BioconBiocon
Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China

Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China

5/F, Block 518, Fuquan North Road, Changning District, Shanghai, 200335, CN

Last Update: 07/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.mybeckman.cn/
768/1000Fair

贝克曼库尔特生命科学事业部一直致力于改善全世界人类的健康。在过去的一百年里,“贝克曼”、“库尔特”卓越品牌的各种仪器已被世界各地医务人员和科研工作者所普遍认可和接受。贝克曼库尔特生命科学事业部为广大科研、商业实验室的生命科学研究工作者们提供先进的仪器系统、试剂和优质的技术服务与支持,不断促进生物学科研的新技术发展。我们的技术支持和售后服务网络遍及全球,营销达至130多个国家。公司主要产品包括流式细胞仪、离心机、实验室自动化系统、细胞与颗粒计数器以及粒度分析仪等,其产品主要用于前沿的重要研究领域,包括基因组学、蛋白质组学、细胞组学以及生...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:67
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Biocon

Biocon

Hosur Road, Electronics City, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN, 560100

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.biocon.com
772/1000Fair

Biocon: Enhancing Global Healthcare Biocon Limited, publicly listed in 2004, is India's largest and fully-integrated, innovation-led biopharmaceutical company. It is an emerging global biopharmaceutical enterprise serving customers in over 120 countries. Driven by a...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:11,558
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China

Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Biocon

Biocon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Biocon in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Biocon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Biocon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China

Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Biocon

Biocon

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China company and Biocon company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China company and Biocon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China company and Biocon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China company and Biocon company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China company and Biocon company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China company and Biocon company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China company and Biocon company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China company and Biocon company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China company and Biocon company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China company and Biocon company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China company and Biocon company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China and Biocon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China and Biocon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China or Biocon ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China or Biocon ?
Between Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China and Biocon, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Beckman Coulter Life Sciences - China and Biocon, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-7654
SUMMARY

The Admin Columns plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection leading to Remote Code Execution in versions up to and including 7.0.18. This is due to the use of `unserialize()` without an `allowed_classes` restriction in the `IdsToCollection::get_ids_from_string()` function, which processes attacker-controlled post meta values without proper validation. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with Contributor-level access and above to inject a serialized PHP object into a post's custom meta field and trigger arbitrary code execution by exploiting a bundled POP gadget chain, resulting in remote code execution as the web server user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-05
UPDATED
Date2026-06-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-7523
SUMMARY

The Alba Board plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.3. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to access arbitrary private alba_card post data, including title, description, assignee, due date, tags, and comments, that is intended to be restricted to Administrators and Editors. The handler is registered via the wp_ajax_nopriv_ hook and its nonce is exposed to all site visitors through wp_localize_script on pages containing the [alba_board] shortcode, making this exploitable by unauthenticated users who can access any such page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-05
UPDATED
Date2026-06-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-45409
SUMMARY

Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA) for Python provides support for Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA) and Unicode IDNA Compatibility Processing. In versions prior to 3.15, payloads such as `"\u0660" * N` or `"\u30fb" * N + "\u6f22"` utilize the `valid_contexto` function prior to length rejection, and for high values of `N` will take a long time to process. This is the same issue as CVE-2024-3651, however the original remediation in 2024 was not a complete fix. A specially crafted argument to the `idna.encode()` function could consume significant resources. This may lead to a denial-of-service. Starting in version 3.14, the function rejects long inputs as soon as practicable prior to any further processing to minimize resource consumption. In version 3.15, this approach was extended to lesser used alternate functions (i.e. per-label conversions and codec support). A workaround is available. Domain names cannot exceed 253 characters in length. If this length limit is enforced prior to passing the domain to the `idna.encode()` function, it should no longer consume significant resources. This is triggered by arbitrarily large inputs that would not occur in normal usage, but may be passed to the library assuming there is no preliminary input validation by the higher-level application.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-05
UPDATED
Date2026-06-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-11431
SUMMARY

A path traversal vulnerability exists in the Projects Service download endpoint shared by Altium Enterprise Server and Altium 365. An authenticated user can supply a crafted path parameter that bypasses validation, allowing arbitrary files (including entire directories returned as archives) to be read from the server filesystem. Because the readable files include service configuration and credential material, exploitation can be used to gather information enabling further compromise. The issue can be combined with CVE-2026-11424 to reach the cloud-side endpoint. On multi-tenant Altium 365 deployments, the readable configuration could have exposed credentials shared across services. Altium Enterprise Server is fixed in 8.1.1; the issue has been remediated in Altium 365 at the service level.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-05
UPDATED
Date2026-06-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-11429
SUMMARY

A path traversal vulnerability exists in the Git Service component shared by Altium Enterprise Server and Altium 365. The service accepts a sequence of post-clone file-manipulation operations that use user-supplied paths without validation, allowing an authenticated user with basic git access to move arbitrary files outside the intended repository area. This file-move primitive can be used to place attacker-controlled script content into directories where it is later executed by the service, resulting in remote code execution under the Git Service account. On multi-tenant Altium 365 deployments, this could have allowed access to data belonging to other tenants on the same infrastructure node. Altium Enterprise Server is fixed in 8.1.1; the issue has been remediated in Altium 365 at the service level.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-05
UPDATED
Date2026-06-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA