Comparison Overview
BdThemes Limited

BdThemes Limited
1995/2 Latifpur Moddhopara, Bogra, 5800, BD
Last Update: 10/08/2026
BdThemes is a software product company focused on WordPress product development. Aiming to enhance the web-building experience for users by providing top-notch solutions that help businesses grow. Its journey started back in 2012 as a theme development company with 4 f...

Upwork
475 Brannan St, San Francisco, 94107, US
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Upwork is the world’s work marketplace that connects businesses with independent talent from across the globe. We serve everyone from one-person startups to large, Fortune 100 enterprises with a powerful, trust-driven platform that enables companies and talent to work t...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

BdThemes Limited







Upwork






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
BdThemes Limited has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Upwork in 2026.
Incident History - BdThemes Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BdThemes Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Upwork (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Upwork cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

BdThemes Limited

Upwork
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.