Comparison Overview
BDO Nederland

BDO Nederland
Philitelaan 73, Eindhoven, undefined, 5617 AM, NL
Last Update: 09/01/2026
At BDO, we help people and organisations achieve their sustainable future. By providing insight and certainty of true value. And this is not just about money. Or about maximum profit. We look at our profession in a new way. With a broader view. And are more mindful of ...

Grant Thornton (US)
171 N. Clark Street, Suite 200, Chicago, IL, US, 60601
Last Update: 02/04/2026
In the US, Grant Thornton LLP and Grant Thornton Advisors LLC (and their respective subsidiary entities) practice as an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations and professional standards. G...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

BDO Nederland







Grant Thornton (US)






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BDO Nederland in 2026.
Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Grant Thornton (US) in 2026.
Incident History - BDO Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BDO Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Grant Thornton (US) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Grant Thornton (US) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

BDO Nederland

Grant Thornton (US)
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.