Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BD BiosciencesBD Biosciences
VS
RegeneronRegeneron
BD Biosciences

BD Biosciences

N/A

Last Update: 30/01/2026

View Profile
763/1000Fair

BD Biosciences provides flow-cytometry and single-cell multiomics solutions with world class support and continuous innovation. BD is one of the largest global medical technology companies in the world and is advancing the world of health™ by improving medical discover...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Regeneron

Regeneron

777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, 10591, US

Last Update: 21/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.regeneron.com
818/1000Good

At Regeneron we believe that when the right idea finds the right team, powerful change is possible. As we work across our expanding global network to invent, develop and commercialize life-transforming medicines for people with serious diseases, we’re establishing new w...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:16,502
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BD Biosciences

BD Biosciences

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Regeneron

Regeneron

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BD Biosciences in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Biotechnology Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Regeneron in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BD Biosciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BD Biosciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Regeneron (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Regeneron cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BD Biosciences

BD Biosciences

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Regeneron

Regeneron

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BD Biosciences company and Regeneron company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BD Biosciences company and Regeneron company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BD Biosciences company and Regeneron company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BD Biosciences company and Regeneron company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BD Biosciences company and Regeneron company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BD Biosciences company and Regeneron company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BD Biosciences company and Regeneron company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BD Biosciences company and Regeneron company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BD Biosciences company and Regeneron company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BD Biosciences company and Regeneron company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BD Biosciences company and Regeneron company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BD Biosciences and Regeneron, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BD Biosciences and Regeneron, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BD Biosciences or Regeneron ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BD Biosciences or Regeneron ?
Between BD Biosciences and Regeneron, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BD Biosciences and Regeneron, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9