Comparison Overview
BC Clinical and Support Services

BC Clinical and Support Services
1795 Willingdon Ave, Burnaby, V5C 6E3, CA
Last Update: 14/12/2025
On June 29, 2018, BC Clinical and Support Services (BCCSS) and the Provincial Health Services Authority (PHSA) amalgamated to form one combined organization. This amalgamation is the result of an expanded mandate for PHSA from the Ministry of Health to drive system-wid...

UNC Health
101 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, US, 27516
Last Update: 11/09/2026
Our mission is to improve the health and well-being of North Carolinians and others whom we serve. We accomplish this by providing leadership and excellence in the interrelated areas of patient care, education and research. UNC Health and its 40,000 teammates, continue...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

BC Clinical and Support Services







UNC Health






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BC Clinical and Support Services in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UNC Health in 2026.
Incident History - BC Clinical and Support Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BC Clinical and Support Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - UNC Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UNC Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

BC Clinical and Support Services

UNC Health
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.