Comparison Overview
BBVA

BBVA
Plaza de San Nicolas 4, Bilbao, 48005, ES
Last Update: 31/03/2026
At BBVA we are leading the transformation of banking worldwide, united in pursuing our goal of bringing the age of opportunity to everyone. Firmly focused on the future, our on-going digital transformation is already producing disruptive innovations that power our visio...

Bank Mega
Menara Bank Mega, Jakarta, 12790, ID
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Sebagai bagian dari CT Corp, Bank Mega terus menghadirkan layanan perbankan yang modern, inklusif, dan berorientasi pada kebutuhan masyarakat Indonesia. Mengusung visi “Menjadi Kebanggaan Bangsa”, kami berkomitmen menciptakan nilai tambah bagi nasabah dan karyawan melal...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

BBVA







Bank Mega






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BBVA in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bank Mega in 2026.
Incident History - BBVA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BBVA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Bank Mega (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bank Mega cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

BBVA

Bank Mega
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.