Comparison Overview
BBVA en Perú

BBVA en Perú
República de Panamá 3055, San Isidro,, Lima 27, undefined, undefined, PE
Last Update: 22/01/2026
Somos BBVA Perú, el banco peruano del grupo financiero global BBVA, que está liderando la transformación de la banca en el mundo. BBVA tiene más de 150 años de experiencia y más de 120,000 colaboradores en +25 países, llegando a +70 millones de clientes con soluciones i...

alrajhi bank
King Fahad Branch Road, Al Rajhi Tower, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, SA, 11411
Last Update: 04/05/2026
Founded in 1957, Al Rajhi Bank is one of the largest Islamic banks in the world with total assets of SR 384 billion (US$ 102 billion), a paid up capital of SR 25 billion (US$ 6.66 billion) and an employee base of over 9,600 associates. With over 58 years of experience i...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

BBVA en Perú







alrajhi bank






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BBVA en Perú in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
alrajhi bank has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - BBVA en Perú (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BBVA en Perú cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - alrajhi bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
alrajhi bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

BBVA en Perú

alrajhi bank
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Capgo (Cap-go/capgo) before 12.128.2 contains an improper access control vulnerability in the SECURITY DEFINER PostgREST RPC function public.record_build_time, which is granted to the anon role and callable with only the public Supabase publishable (sb_publishable_*) anon key. An unauthenticated attacker can insert rows into public.build_logs for arbitrary organizations and, because the function uses ON CONFLICT (build_id, org_id) DO UPDATE, can overwrite existing usage/billing records by reusing the same build_id for a target org. This enables cross-tenant tampering of billing build logs and financial-impact denial of service by inflating billable build time.
Cap-go before 12.128.2 contains an authentication logic flaw that lets an attacker register and control an account bound to a victim's email address before that email is verified. By enabling two-factor authentication on the pre-registered account, the attacker gains control over the account claimed under the victim's identity, allowing them to read and modify its state and enforce organization-level policies, while the legitimate user is denied access to the account tied to their own email.
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a flaw in the Enforce Password Policy feature: after a Super Admin enables the policy and successfully changes their password to a compliant one, the backend does not update the password-compliance state. As a result, the backend continues to treat the account as non-compliant and repeatedly forces password-reset prompts, permanently locking the Super Admin out of organization access (organization lockout / denial of service) despite valid authentication.
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a cross-tenant authorization bypass vulnerability in PostgREST endpoints that allows org-scoped read API keys to access other tenants' webhook secrets and delivery logs. Attackers can query the webhooks and webhook_deliveries endpoints to exfiltrate HMAC signing secrets and delivery payloads, enabling forged webhook events against victim organizations.
Cap-go before 12.128.2 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in OTP verification that allows attackers to bypass email verification by modifying server responses. Attackers can intercept OTP verification requests and manipulate HTTP responses to falsely mark verification successful, enabling unauthorized 2FA enablement and account takeover.