Comparison Overview

B. Braun Group

VS

Boston Scientific

B. Braun Group

Carl-Braun-Straße 1, Melsungen, 34212, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

As a leading medical technology company, B. Braun protects and improves the health of people around the world. For more than 185 years, the family-owned company has been accelerating progress in health care with pioneering spirit and groundbreaking contributions. This innovative strength continues to be the foundation of B. Braun's success today—always with the goal of improving clinical outcomes, cost of care and patient benefits. More than 64,000 employees live Sharing Expertise worldwide, they make B. Braun a true partner that develops integrated solutions and sets new standards. By linking products, services and consulting, the company improves treatment processes and supports medical staff. In doing so, B. Braun always acts with future generations in mind, which is why responsibility for sustainable growth is embedded into all business processes. In 2024, the B. Braun Group generated sales of € 9.1 billion. Imprint: https://www.bbraun.com/en/imprint.html Privacy Policy: https://www.bbraun.com/en/privacy-policy.html

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 27,879
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Boston Scientific

100 Boston Scientific Way, Marlborough, MA, US, 01752
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Boston Scientific transforms lives through innovative medical technologies that improve the health of patients around the world. As a global medical technology leader for more than 40 years, we advance science for life by providing a broad range of high-performance solutions that address unmet patient needs and reduce the cost of health care. Our portfolio of devices and therapies helps physicians diagnose and treat complex cardiovascular, respiratory, digestive, oncological, neurological and urological diseases and conditions. For more information, visit www.bostonscientific.com and connect with us on X, Instagram, and Facebook. At Boston Scientific, you will find purpose, a place to grow and opportunities to cultivate your passions. To search and apply for open positions, visit https://bostonscientific.eightfold.ai/careers. You may also review our social media guidelines at http://www.bostonscientific.com/social.

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 48,432
Subsidiaries: 153
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bbraun-group.jpeg
B. Braun Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-scientific.jpeg
Boston Scientific
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
B. Braun Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Boston Scientific
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for B. Braun Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boston Scientific in 2025.

Incident History — B. Braun Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

B. Braun Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Boston Scientific (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boston Scientific cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bbraun-group.jpeg
B. Braun Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-scientific.jpeg
Boston Scientific
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: malicious insider, unauthorized network access, ransomware deployment (BlackCat/ALPHV)
Motivation: financial gain, personal debt (Goldberg), enrichment
Blog: Blog

FAQ

B. Braun Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Boston Scientific company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Boston Scientific company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas B. Braun Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Boston Scientific company and B. Braun Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Boston Scientific company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while B. Braun Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Boston Scientific company nor B. Braun Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Boston Scientific company nor B. Braun Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither B. Braun Group company nor Boston Scientific company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither B. Braun Group nor Boston Scientific holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Boston Scientific company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to B. Braun Group company.

Boston Scientific company employs more people globally than B. Braun Group company, reflecting its scale as a Medical Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither B. Braun Group nor Boston Scientific holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither B. Braun Group nor Boston Scientific holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither B. Braun Group nor Boston Scientific holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither B. Braun Group nor Boston Scientific holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither B. Braun Group nor Boston Scientific holds HIPAA certification.

Neither B. Braun Group nor Boston Scientific holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H