Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBLFederal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL
VS
Tata GroupTata Group
Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL

Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL

Fellerstrasse 21, Bern, BE, 3003, CH

Last Update: 04/12/2025

View Profile
746/1000Moderate

The FOBL is part of the Department of Finance and provides services for the entire civil federal administration as well as for the public. The Office is divided into the areas of "Buildings, "Logistics", "Official business, procurement policy, communication" and "Manage...

NAICS:92111
NAICS Definition:Executive Offices
Employees:287
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tata Group

Tata Group

Bombay House, Mumbai, 400001, IN

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tata.com
782/1000Fair

Founded by Jamsetji Tata in 1868, the Tata group is a global enterprise headquartered in India. The group operates in more than 100 countries across six continents with a mission 'To improve the quality of life of the communities we serve globally, through long-term sta...

NAICS:92111
NAICS Definition:Executive Offices
Employees:1,017,747
Subsidiaries:69
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL

Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tata Group

Tata Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Avg (This Year)

Tata Group has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tata Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL

Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tata Group

Tata Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TATRED1782606562
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MIC1773923106
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MAR1193411110425

FAQ

Between Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL company and Tata Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL company and Tata Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL company and Tata Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL company and Tata Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL company and Tata Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL company and Tata Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL company and Tata Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL company and Tata Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL company and Tata Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL company and Tata Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL company and Tata Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL and Tata Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL and Tata Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL or Tata Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL or Tata Group ?
Between Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL and Tata Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics FOBL and Tata Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3