Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Brown & Brown Absence Services GroupBrown & Brown Absence Services Group
VS
Sunshine Insurance GroupSunshine Insurance Group
Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

300 N Beach Street, Daytona Beach, 32114, US

Last Update: 22/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://bbabsence.com/
752/1000Fair

The Advocator Group is now Brown & Brown Absence Services Group. We offer disability insurance carriers, self-insured entities, and third-party administrators industry-wide expertise and extensive capabilities designed to help our customers overcome challenges, make mor...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:175
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sunshine Insurance Group

Sunshine Insurance Group

朝外大街, 朝阳区, 100020, CN

Last Update: 04/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sinosig.com/
766/1000Fair

Established in July 2005, Sunshine Insurance Group has experienced sustainable development, now ranking among the Top 7 insurance groups in China, with an annual business income of $12.6 billion in 2016. Sunshine is composed of Property and Casualty Insurance, Life Insu...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:10,347
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sunshine Insurance Group

Sunshine Insurance Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brown & Brown Absence Services Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sunshine Insurance Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Brown & Brown Absence Services Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brown & Brown Absence Services Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sunshine Insurance Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sunshine Insurance Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sunshine Insurance Group

Sunshine Insurance Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group and Sunshine Insurance Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group and Sunshine Insurance Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Brown & Brown Absence Services Group or Sunshine Insurance Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Brown & Brown Absence Services Group or Sunshine Insurance Group ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group and Sunshine Insurance Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group and Sunshine Insurance Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA