Comparison Overview
Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

Brown & Brown Absence Services Group
300 N Beach Street, Daytona Beach, 32114, US
Last Update: 22/02/2026
The Advocator Group is now Brown & Brown Absence Services Group. We offer disability insurance carriers, self-insured entities, and third-party administrators industry-wide expertise and extensive capabilities designed to help our customers overcome challenges, make mor...

MetLife
200 Park Ave, New York, NY, US, 10166
Last Update: 04/04/2026
We live in a time of unprecedented change. A time when economies, regulations, and social safety nets are all in flux. Customers around the globe have told us they’re overwhelmed by the pace of change and are looking for a trusted partner to help them manage life’s twi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Brown & Brown Absence Services Group







MetLife






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Brown & Brown Absence Services Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MetLife in 2026.
Incident History - Brown & Brown Absence Services Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Brown & Brown Absence Services Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - MetLife (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MetLife cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

MetLife
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.