Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Brown & Brown Absence Services GroupBrown & Brown Absence Services Group
VS
GEICOGEICO
Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

300 N Beach Street, Daytona Beach, 32114, US

Last Update: 22/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://bbabsence.com/
752/1000Fair

The Advocator Group is now Brown & Brown Absence Services Group. We offer disability insurance carriers, self-insured entities, and third-party administrators industry-wide expertise and extensive capabilities designed to help our customers overcome challenges, make mor...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:175
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GEICO

GEICO

5260 Western Avenue, Chevy Chase, 20815, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
762/1000Fair

At GEICO, we offer a rewarding career where your ambitions are met with endless possibilities. Every day we honor our iconic brand by offering quality coverage to millions of customers and being there when they need us most. We thrive on relentless innovation to exceed...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:31,322
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GEICO

GEICO

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brown & Brown Absence Services Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GEICO in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Brown & Brown Absence Services Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brown & Brown Absence Services Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GEICO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GEICO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GEICO

GEICO

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GEI428072525

FAQ

Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and GEICO company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and GEICO company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and GEICO company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and GEICO company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and GEICO company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and GEICO company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and GEICO company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and GEICO company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and GEICO company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and GEICO company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and GEICO company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group and GEICO, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group and GEICO, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Brown & Brown Absence Services Group or GEICO ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Brown & Brown Absence Services Group or GEICO ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group and GEICO, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group and GEICO, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA