Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Brown & Brown Absence Services GroupBrown & Brown Absence Services Group
VS
CNO Financial GroupCNO Financial Group
Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

300 N Beach Street, Daytona Beach, 32114, US

Last Update: 22/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://bbabsence.com/
752/1000Fair

The Advocator Group is now Brown & Brown Absence Services Group. We offer disability insurance carriers, self-insured entities, and third-party administrators industry-wide expertise and extensive capabilities designed to help our customers overcome challenges, make mor...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:175
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
CNO Financial Group

CNO Financial Group

11825 N Pennsylvania St, Carmel, Indiana, US, 46032

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.CNOinc.com
744/1000Moderate

CNO Financial Group, Inc. (NYSE: CNO) secures the future of middle-income America. CNO provides life and health insurance, annuities, financial services, and workforce benefits solutions through our family of brands, including Bankers Life, Colonial Penn, Optavise an...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:13,883
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CNO Financial Group

CNO Financial Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brown & Brown Absence Services Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CNO Financial Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Brown & Brown Absence Services Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brown & Brown Absence Services Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CNO Financial Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CNO Financial Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

Brown & Brown Absence Services Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
CNO Financial Group

CNO Financial Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CNO912072825

FAQ

Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and CNO Financial Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and CNO Financial Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and CNO Financial Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and CNO Financial Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and CNO Financial Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and CNO Financial Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and CNO Financial Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and CNO Financial Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and CNO Financial Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and CNO Financial Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group company and CNO Financial Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group and CNO Financial Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group and CNO Financial Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Brown & Brown Absence Services Group or CNO Financial Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Brown & Brown Absence Services Group or CNO Financial Group ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group and CNO Financial Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Brown & Brown Absence Services Group and CNO Financial Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1