Comparison Overview
Baylor Genetics

Baylor Genetics
2450 Holcombe Blvd, Ste O 100, Houston, Texas, US, 77021
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Baylor Genetics is a joint venture of H.U. Group Holdings, Inc. and Baylor College of Medicine, including the #1 NIH-funded Department of Molecular and Human Genetics. Located in Houston’s Texas Medical Center, Baylor Genetics serves clients in 50 states and 16 countrie...

Thermo Fisher Scientific
168 Third Avenue, Waltham, MA, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
About Thermo Fisher Scientific Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. is the world leader in serving science, with annual revenue of approximately $40 billion. Our Mission is to enable our customers to make the world healthier, cleaner and safer. Whether our customers are accele...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Baylor Genetics







Thermo Fisher Scientific






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Baylor Genetics in 2026.
Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Thermo Fisher Scientific in 2026.
Incident History - Baylor Genetics (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Baylor Genetics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Thermo Fisher Scientific (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Thermo Fisher Scientific cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Baylor Genetics

Thermo Fisher Scientific
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.