Comparison Overview

Baxter International Inc.

VS

Olympus Corporation

Baxter International Inc.

1 Baxter Pkwy, Deerfield, Illinois, US, 60015
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749

For nearly a century, we have delivered on our commitment to saving and sustaining the lives of patients, working alongside clinicians and providers around the world. We believe every person — regardless of who they are or where they are from — deserves a chance to live a healthy life, free from illness and full of possibility. At the intersection of progress and purpose is where we are redefining what it means to be a global medtech leader. It is where we are relentlessly pursuing healthcare transformation, fueled by our compassion for patients and providers and the challenges they face. It is where bold ideas meet the promise for meaningful change in the world around us. We are there, at every step of the journey, to help clinicians deliver the best care possible.

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 36,242
Subsidiaries: 28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Olympus Corporation

Nishi-shinjuku 2-3-1 Shinjuku Monolith, None, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JP, None
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Olympus is passionate about creating customer-driven solutions for the medical industry. For more than 100 years, Olympus has focused on making people’s lives healthier, safer and more fulfilling by helping detect, prevent, and treat disease, furthering scientific research, and ensuring public safety. Olympus is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan, with more than 31,000 employees worldwide in nearly 40 countries and regions.

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 10,074
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baxter-healthcare.jpeg
Baxter International Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/olympus-corp.jpeg
Olympus Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Baxter International Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Olympus Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baxter International Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Olympus Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Baxter International Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baxter International Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Olympus Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Olympus Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baxter-healthcare.jpeg
Baxter International Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/olympus-corp.jpeg
Olympus Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Olympus Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Baxter International Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Baxter International Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Olympus Corporation company has not reported any.

In the current year, Olympus Corporation company and Baxter International Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Olympus Corporation company nor Baxter International Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Baxter International Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Olympus Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Olympus Corporation company nor Baxter International Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Baxter International Inc. company nor Olympus Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Baxter International Inc. nor Olympus Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Baxter International Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Olympus Corporation company.

Baxter International Inc. company employs more people globally than Olympus Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Medical Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Baxter International Inc. nor Olympus Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Baxter International Inc. nor Olympus Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Baxter International Inc. nor Olympus Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Baxter International Inc. nor Olympus Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Baxter International Inc. nor Olympus Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Baxter International Inc. nor Olympus Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N